Tampilkan postingan dengan label Download. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Download. Tampilkan semua postingan
The Effect of ChangingThe Temperature of Equilibrium System
The effect of changing the temperature of equilibrium system can be predicted from a knowledge of the heats of reaction. If the temperature of a system is lowered, the exothermic reaction is favoured. If the temperature isincreased, the endhotermic reaction is favoured.
For the N2O4/NO2 system the forward reaction is endothermic.N2O4 + 57 kJ <===> NO2
The forward reaction therefore absorbs heat from the surroundings and the reverse reaction releases heat to the surroundings. According to Le Chatelier’s principle, if the temperature of an equilibrium system is increased the system will adjust to re-establish equilibrium in such a way as to decrease the temperature. Therefore in re-establishing equilibrium the endothermic reaction is favoured as this absorbs heat from the surroundings and would tend to decrease the temperature. In the N2O4/NO2 system this would result in an increase in the concentration of NO2 and a decrease in the cpncentration of N2O4.
If the temperature of the equilibrium system was reduced the system would re-establish equilibrium by favouring the exothermic reaction. This would tend to increase the temperature of the surroundings, partially counteracting the change. In the N2O4/NO2 system, more N2O4 and less NO2 would be present when equilibriuym was re-established.
If the temperature of the equilibrium system was reduced the system would re-establish equilibrium by favouring the exothermic reaction. This would tend to increase the temperature of the surroundings, partially counteracting the change. In the N2O4/NO2 system, more N2O4 and less NO2 would be present when equilibriuym was re-established.
View the demonstration video
Rutherford Atomic Model
By 1909, Ernest Rutherford had established that alpha particles are positively charged particles. They are emitted at high kinetic energies by some radioactive atoms, that is, atoms that disintegrate spontaneously. In 1910, Rutherford’s research group carried out a series of experiments that had an enormous impact on the scientific world. They bombarded a very thin piece of gold foil with alpha-particles from a radioactive source. A fluorescent zinc sulfide screen was placed behind the foil to indicate the scattering of the alpha-particles by the gold foil (Figure 5-4). Scintillations (flashes) on the screen, caused by the individual alpha-particles, were counted to determine the relative numbers of alpha-particles deflected at various angles. Alpha particles were known to be extremely dense, much denser than gold.
If the Thomson model of the atom were correct, any alpha-particles passing through the foil would have been deflected by very small angles. Quite unexpectedly, nearly all of the alpha-particles passed through the foil with little or no deflection. A few, however, were deflected through large angles, and a very few -particles even returned from the gold foil in the direction from which they had come! Rutherford was astounded. In his own words, It was quite the most incredible event that has ever happened to me in my life. It was almost as if you fired a 15-inch shell into a piece of tissue paper and it came back and hit you.
Rutherford’s mathematical analysis of his results showed that the scattering of positively charged alpha-particles was caused by repulsion from very dense regions of positive charge in the gold foil. He concluded that the mass of one of these regions is nearly equal to that of a gold atom, but that the diameter is no more than 1/10,000 that of an atom. Many experiments with foils of different metals yielded similar results. Realizing that these observations were inconsistent with previous theories about atomic structure, Rutherford discarded the old theory and proposed a better one. He suggested that each atom contains a tiny, positively charged, massive center that he called an atomic nucleus. Most alpha-particles pass through metal foils undeflected because atoms are primarily empty space populated only by the very light electrons. The few particles that are deflected are the ones thatcome close to the heavy, highly charged metal nuclei.
Rutherford was able to determine the magnitudes of the positive charges on the atomic nuclei. The picture of atomic structure that he developed is called the Rutherford model of the atom.
If the Thomson model of the atom were correct, any alpha-particles passing through the foil would have been deflected by very small angles. Quite unexpectedly, nearly all of the alpha-particles passed through the foil with little or no deflection. A few, however, were deflected through large angles, and a very few -particles even returned from the gold foil in the direction from which they had come! Rutherford was astounded. In his own words, It was quite the most incredible event that has ever happened to me in my life. It was almost as if you fired a 15-inch shell into a piece of tissue paper and it came back and hit you.
Rutherford’s mathematical analysis of his results showed that the scattering of positively charged alpha-particles was caused by repulsion from very dense regions of positive charge in the gold foil. He concluded that the mass of one of these regions is nearly equal to that of a gold atom, but that the diameter is no more than 1/10,000 that of an atom. Many experiments with foils of different metals yielded similar results. Realizing that these observations were inconsistent with previous theories about atomic structure, Rutherford discarded the old theory and proposed a better one. He suggested that each atom contains a tiny, positively charged, massive center that he called an atomic nucleus. Most alpha-particles pass through metal foils undeflected because atoms are primarily empty space populated only by the very light electrons. The few particles that are deflected are the ones thatcome close to the heavy, highly charged metal nuclei.
Rutherford was able to determine the magnitudes of the positive charges on the atomic nuclei. The picture of atomic structure that he developed is called the Rutherford model of the atom.
"Atoms consist of very small, very dense positively charged nuclei surrounded by clouds of electrons at relatively great distances from the nuclei".
To download animation of Rutherford experiment click here
Milikan Experiment Animation
The Millikan oil-drop experiment. Tiny spherical oil droplets are produced by an atomizer. The mass of the spherical drop can be calculated from its volume (obtained from a measurement of the radius of the drop with a microscope) and the known density of the oil. A few droplets fall through the hole in the upper plate. Irradiation with X-rays gives some of these oil droplets a negative charge. When the voltage between the plates is increased, a negatively charged drop falls more slowly because it is attracted by the positively charged upper plate and repelled by the negatively charged lower plate. At one particular voltage, the electrical force (up) and the gravitational force (down) on the drop are exactly balanced, and the drop remains stationary. Knowing this voltage and the mass of the drop, we can calculate the charge on the drop.
To download Milikan Experiment Click Here
Limiting Reagent
From the balanced equation for a chemical reaction it is possible to calculate the exact quantities of reactants which are consumed and products which are formed. For example, consider the reaction between nitrogen momooxide gas and oxygen gas to form nitrogen dioxide. The equation for the reaction is :
3 NO (g) + O2 (g) → 3 NO2 (g)
From the equation it is evident that every mole of O2 which reacts, three moles of NO are needed and three moles of NO2 will be produced. However, consider the situation where the ratio of coefficients in the balanced chemical equation. In this situation, one of the reactants will be the limiting reagent and the other will be present in excess.
Click here to download animation
3 NO (g) + O2 (g) → 3 NO2 (g)
From the equation it is evident that every mole of O2 which reacts, three moles of NO are needed and three moles of NO2 will be produced. However, consider the situation where the ratio of coefficients in the balanced chemical equation. In this situation, one of the reactants will be the limiting reagent and the other will be present in excess.
Click here to download animation
The Hydrogen Spectrum
The spectrum produces is called a line emission spectrum and indicates that excited atoms emit light of certain frequencies only. The occurrence of line emission spectra for hydrogen and other elements could not be satisfactorily explained in terms of classical physics at the beginning of the twentieth century. To account for these observations a radical revision of the laws and theories of physics was required.
To Download The Hydrogen Spectrum click here
Source of animation from Learnestv.com
Formation of Solution
NaCl (s) → Na+(aq) + Cl-(aq)
This process is known as dissociation. The ions in the ionic solid have been separated in the solution process.
Download Free Formation of Solution
Properties Of Gasses Animation
To download Properties of Gasses click here
Rutherford Experiment Animation
To download Rutherford Animation Click here
Source: Learnestv.com
Le Chatelier’s Principle Animation
‘If a chemical system at equilibrium is subjected to a change in conditions, the system will adjust to re-establish equilibrium in such a way as to partially counteract the imposed change.’
To download this Le Chatelier’s Principle Animation click here
Animation source from Learnestv.com
To download this Le Chatelier’s Principle Animation click here
Animation source from Learnestv.com
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)